Teaching or Preaching

The Texas House is considering a bill that would make classes on the Bible available in public schools. Rep. Warren Chisum, sponsor of the bill, claims that "We're not going to preach the Bible, we're going to teach the Bible and how it affects all of our writings, documents and the formation of our government". If the classes were absolutely just going to teach the Bible, then I'm not sure I would have a problem with this bill. After all, the Bible has significantly impacted history and the classes would be optional.

But I don't think it's possible to bring the Bible into the classrooms without preaching. Some classes will inevitably evolve into sermons at some point. Critics are leveling that claim at some Georgia schools that have adopted similar programs. Teachers in any field have biases, and religious studies are no different. They major in the subject and write papers and a thesis that reflect their opinions.

Furthermore, you run the risk of a student signing up for a class who is genuinely interested in learning about the Bible and its impact, but not in being preached to. Teaching one particular brand of religion has no place in public schools. An interesting and more acceptable course could be one that explores all religions. I feel that too many students only know the Quran as the book of bin Laden.

If parents are so intent on providing their children with a religious education, then they can ingrain those teachings at home, in church, and/or at a private, religious school. Besides, we should be focusing our efforts on reversing frightening downward trends in math, science, and reading.